Here we go ‘round the Obama-‘Bush….

I just  read the story that  President Obama is going to give Iran 10 months shape up or thier nuclear policy or he will start to sanction them.  This sounds like a rehash of what President Bush did with Iraq. If sanctions have as little effect as they did on Iraq, is the US going to invade Iran  ? Looks like history is going to repeat itself again…
Here is the story .:As standoff with Iran continues, U.S. prepares targeted sanctions

Mushrooms and & the Origin of Christmas

Summary: Here is an excellent series of talks on the origin of Christianity .

The lecture is in seven parts.

Denver August 2010 ET ballot initiative places next step in extraterrestrial disclosure on voters

Here is a summary of the story:

Reached for comment by this reporter, Eric M. Brown, communications director for Denver’s Mayor John W. Hickenlooper, stated “We respect the process we have for citizens to put initiatives on the ballot and let voters decide whether to approve them.”

You can red the whole story here:Denver August 2010 ET Ballot

Commentary:                                                           Finallly some positive action is being taken.

Why Politicians are Public Enemy No. 1

“Thus , for the first  time in  the history of man, we have known for  a little over  a decade that there  can be enough to go around and that we are  frustrated from realising  this epochal  potential because of the one hundred or som political  sovereignities which were set up  for mutually-exclusive survival  hopes  under  the Malthusian dictum”,  pg 246   Utopia or Oblivion, B. Fuller

This was written in 1967.  Today this quote is even more relevant than it was then, since we have better technology. Since we have better technology and distribution nets we can theoritcally and practically feed more people.Now Bucky mentions Malthus and his equation. Anybody remember the equation? I do.   Here is the equation and its solution;

The equation is basically of expontential growth without limits. It is used to model bacteria in biology. Malthus used it to model economic growth. The main idea  there is not enough resources for an expanding population, so there will be haves and have nots. The Malthusian equation is an extremely inaccurate model for predicting the future and yet politicians to this day rely on it If they know the logistic  law equation then shame on them for not putting it to use.   One of form the logistic equation is:

For more info on logistic equations see:http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LogisticEquation.html

 To continue on …

“Let us now consider what would happen  if we were  to take all the industrial  machinery away from all the industrial countries around the earth. This means pulling down all the wires, taking up all the tracks, removing all dynamos, and every motor, We take away all industrial equipment away from all countries in Europe,. We take it away from Russia, We take it away all the industrial machinery from China and Japan. We take it away from the United States and Canada. dump all the worlds industrialization into ocean. Within six months , two billion  human beings will starve to death , suffered greatly along the way.

  Now  I am  going to give  you another picture. I am going to leave all the industrial  machinery where it is….Next  we are going to take  away from all the countries of the earth all politicians, all the different political ideologies and the political  party  workers and evey kind. and we are going to send them  all of  for a trip around the sun  As long as the politicians are absent , everybody on earth has been eating is going to keep right on eating, and with all political barriers  down the prospects  of arranging  to take care of the needs  the rest will accelerate, and humanity everywhere on earth will prosper”, pg 247, Utopia or Oblivion

I think these statements are so obvious, The second quote is obvious. Politicians can blather on all they want ,without technology many  people would starve.  The second statement  isn’t that much harder to prove.  Let’s take wars. Wars are based on two reasons, religion and politics. In the past, both of these landed being the same.For the purpose of argument. we will deal with politics. If they are no politicians you can’t raise an army.  How about terrorists ?  Terrorists are politicians too. They have an agenda and usually implement it by force. The difference being terrorists don’t work for a government. Terrorists/freedom fighters work alone.

Lastly why don’t people get rid of government ?  One reason being people are afraid to live alone . They don’t want to have to take of eveything. Another reason is people like government services… All this will be explored in another posting

Obama Attacks Fat Cat Bankers

Obama's Nobel Prize Speech

The use of force at times is necessary, but in the U.S’s cases enough is enough.  Obama using history  top back the war in Afganistan is a poor exucse.  As an historian will mention history repeating itself means lesson gets learnt.

What really got my goat about the speech is that war  is” some level an expression of human feelings”   That is load a crap.  War is the last tool of the diplomat  when everything else goes awry.


Personally I find it hubris that the U.S can win in Afganistan with the number of troops going into it. If we lookat history, Alexander the Great invaded it 300 BC and failed. It was invaded twice by the Mongols  and failed.  The British  invaded twice and failed  These wars were the First Anglo-Afghan War (1838–1842) and Second Anglo-Afghan War (1878–1880)  The Soviets  invaded  on Dec 24 1979 and failed. The Americans after all this thinking that they can do better, President Obama should read his history more carefully.In a previous post I told how you could win in Afganistan, the price would be way to high just to catch a bunch of terrorists.

Obaminaton and other lunacies.

I believe that the U.S does not want to end the war in Iraq and  Afganistan. Why ?  If they ended the wars, there would be less profit for the war industry and we can’t have that can we. Obama’s latest decree to send in 30,000 troops into Afganistan is not going to end the war. It will prolong it.  If they want to end the war,they have to use a swarm tactic.  Think of army ants and how they bring animals hundreds of times their size to their deaths.    National Security Adviser James Jones said “We have strategic interests in South Asia that should not be measured in terms of finite times. We’re going to be in the region for a long time.”

http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheat-sheet/item/no-set-plan-for-withdrawal/afghanistan/?cid=cs:headline1

At first,I really liked Obama, but now I see him as just another stooge  for special interest groups and bankers etc…  Yup  Obama could very well plunge the U.S into perpetual war and possibly bankrupt the US.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/ron-paul-obama-is-preparing-for-perpetual-war.html

I was at prisonplanet.com  listening to Ron Paul’s  speech.  He is everyway correct.  The U.S should not be the police of the world. You can hear what he said below:


 Polliticians by definition are public servants. They should not be looked at as demi-gods.  They should be put on a short leash and when  doing idiotic things have leash pulled hard and punished.